Alternative investments can play a role in some portfolios when an investor has a long time horizon, sufficient liquidity elsewhere, and a clear purpose for the allocation. Because alternatives can be less transparent and harder to sell, they should be evaluated within a comprehensive financial plan—not as a shortcut to higher returns.
"Our trust in his recommendations is rock solid. We always know he has our best interest at heart." The statement was provided 5/30/24 by Ellen and Niel D., who are clients. This statement may not be representative of the experience of others and is not a guarantee of future performance or success. For additional reviews, search us wherever local businesses are reviewed. |
If you’ve followed financial markets for any length of time, you’ve probably heard the term alternative investments. Sometimes they’re presented as sophisticated tools for wealthy investors. Other times they’re marketed as a solution to stock market volatility—or even as a way to “beat the market.”
So what are alternative investments, really?
And more importantly: should you actually own them?
As a St. Louis–based financial advisory firm, this is one of the most common and misunderstood questions we hear. The answer is rarely a simple yes or no. It depends on what the alternative investment is, why it’s being considered, and how it fits into a broader financial plan.
Let’s break it down—plain English, no hype.
What Are Alternative Investments?
In broad terms, alternative investments are assets that fall outside traditional stocks, bonds, and cash.
Common categories include:
Private equity (ownership in private companies)
Private credit (lending outside public bond markets)
Real assets (real estate, infrastructure, farmland, timber)
Hedge fund strategies (long/short, market neutral, arbitrage)
Commodities (energy, metals, agriculture)
Digital assets (such as cryptocurrency—though we will not address that in this article)
Unlike publicly traded stocks or mutual funds, many alternative investments are:
Less liquid
Less transparent
More complex
Subject to different regulatory frameworks
That doesn’t make them bad—but it does mean they must be evaluated carefully.
Why Do Investors Consider Alternatives?
Historically, alternatives have been used for three main reasons:
1. Diversification
Some alternative investments behave differently than stocks and bonds, particularly during periods of market stress. That can reduce portfolio volatility—but only if the alternative truly has a low correlation to traditional assets.
2. Return Potential
Certain alternatives may offer higher expected returns than public markets—but usually in exchange for:
Illiquidity
Complexity
Longer time horizons
Higher risk
There is no free lunch.
3. Income Generation
Private credit, real estate, and infrastructure investments may generate ongoing income—but those cash flows are not guaranteed and can change quickly in stressed environments.
The Trade-Offs Most Investors Miss
This is where the conversation often gets incomplete.
Illiquidity Is Real
Many alternative investments require you to lock up capital for years, not months. Even investments with periodic redemption windows may suspend withdrawals during market stress—often precisely when investors want liquidity most.
Valuations Can Lag Reality
Unlike public markets, alternatives are often valued quarterly (or less frequently). That can create the appearance of lower volatility—when in reality, price discovery is simply delayed.
Fees Matter—A Lot
Alternatives frequently come with layered fees:
Management fees
Performance fees
Fund-level expenses
Underlying investment costs
These fees don’t make an investment bad—but they raise the bar for it to add value.
Complexity Increases Behavioral Risk
If you don’t fully understand how an investment works, it becomes much harder to stay disciplined when markets get uncomfortable.
Investors often focus on expected returns, but real-world outcomes are driven just as much by behavior and risk management. We explore this further in our article [Understanding Portfolio Risk Beyond Volatility], where we break down why some portfolios feel stable on paper—but behave very differently during market stress.
Investors often focus on expected returns, but real-world outcomes are driven just as much by behavior and risk management. We explore this further in our article [Understanding Portfolio Risk Beyond Volatility], where we break down why some portfolios feel stable on paper—but behave very differently during market stress. |
Who Might Be a Good Fit for Alternative Investments?
In our experience, alternatives tend to make the most sense when all of the following are true:
The investor has long-term capital they don’t need for near-term spending
The portfolio is already well-diversified using traditional assets
The investor understands and accepts illiquidity risk
The allocation size is appropriate (not “bet the farm”)
The investment is evaluated as part of a comprehensive financial plan, not in isolation
Alternatives should complement a portfolio—not rescue it.
Who Should Be Cautious (or Avoid Them Entirely)?
Alternatives may not be appropriate if:
You expect to need the money in the next few years
You rely heavily on portfolio withdrawals for living expenses
You are uncomfortable with limited transparency
You’re being sold an investment primarily on past performance
You don’t clearly understand how—and when—you can exit
When complexity rises, planning discipline matters even more.
A Common Mistake: Treating Alternatives as a Shortcut
One of the biggest risks we see is investors using alternatives as a reaction:
To market volatility
To disappointing recent returns
To fear of “missing out”
That’s rarely a good reason to change course.
Sound investing—alternative or otherwise—starts with goals, cash flow needs, taxes, and risk tolerance. Not headlines.
How We Think About Alternatives at Our Firm
We don’t believe alternative investments are inherently good or bad.
We believe they should:
Serve a clear purpose
Be sized appropriately
Be evaluated with full awareness of risks
Be continuously monitored within the context of the entire plan
In some portfolios, alternatives play a meaningful role.
In others, they add unnecessary complexity without sufficient benefit.
The difference is intentional design.
Contact Us Today To Get Started
Final Thought
Alternative investments can be powerful tools—but only when used thoughtfully.
They are not replacements for a solid financial plan.
They are not shortcuts around market risk.
And they are not appropriate for everyone.
If you’re curious whether alternatives make sense for you, the most productive next step isn’t picking a product—it’s having a structured conversation about your goals, constraints, and long-term strategy.
If that’s a conversation you’d like to have, we’re always happy to start there.
Investing in alternative investments may not be suitable for all investors and involves special risks, such as risk associated with leveraging the investment, utilizing complex financial derivatives, adverse market forces, regulatory and tax code changes, and illiquidity. There is no assurance that the investment objective will be attained.
If you enjoyed this piece on Alternative Investments, you may also like these articles:
Estate Planning for those with $5 million portfolios
Warren Buffett's Most Overlooked Lesson
The Costly Fall of Fame: 5 Professional Athletes Who Lost It All
John Bogle: The Legacy of the Vanguard Founder and His Philosophy on Investing
Sources & Further Reading
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Investor Bulletin – Alternative Investments
FINRA: Understanding Alternative Investments
CFA Institute: Alternative Investments Primer
Vanguard Research: The Role of Alternatives in a Portfolio
JPMorgan Asset Management: Guide to Alternatives