You are viewing a preview location.
Broker Check
Weekly Update: Is Current Monetary Policy Restrictive?

Weekly Update: Is Current Monetary Policy Restrictive?

September 22, 2025





Weekly Market Update
September 22, 2025
Outlook

Political pressure to lower interest rates, currently and historically, typically means the administration is asserting that the Federal Reserve (the Fed) should lower its target overnight lending rate it offers to member banks (aka Fed Fund rates) - who in turn facilitate overnight lending to other banks. This overnight lending relationship reverberates throughout the financial system effecting most short-term borrowing activities of corporations, financial institutions, and consumers. Medium and long-term interest rates are affected in part by short-term rates and market expectations. Through open-market operations, the Fed has a strong ability to impact short-term rates. When Fed Fund rates are high, it disincentivizes borrowing activity, which is generally accepted as a way to slow down the economy.

The rate of inflation is the typical benchmark used to determine if the Fed Funds rate is restrictive or accommodative. When the Fed Funds rate is higher than inflation, it is considered restrictive. When it is lower than inflation, the Fed Fund rate is considered to be accommodative. The natural bias and preference for presidential administrations is for the Fed Funds rate to be accommodative, as it is a generally accepted way to stimulate the economy — at the risk of additional inflation. However, the Fed's dual mandate is to aim for full employment and consumer price stability - meaning the Fed is more likely to be restrictive when inflation is a problem and accommodative when employment is less than full.

Currently, the Fed Funds policy is restrictive (effective Fed Funds rate of 4.08% vs. 2.92% for CPI inflation).1 So how restrictive is current policy? Historically, dating back to July 1954, it is not very restrictive. Policy has been restrictive 66% of the time when comparing the Effective Fed Funds rate vs. year-over-year Consumer Price Index (CPI). For all months, the Fed Funds policy rate has been higher than inflation by a median of 1.29% vs. the current policy restrictiveness of 1.16%.

As a result, current policy is in line with typical historical levels. An independent Fed will typically proceed following the squeaky wheel principle of addressing which is more problematic - employment or inflation. The Fed is also more likely to do nothing if neither wheel is squeaking more. Today, it's not clear that either wheel is squeaking louder given low rates of unemployment and reasonable inflation. As a result, the Fed's current dovish posturing may be putting the Fed's independence in question (for some Fed watchers) in addition to putting inflation risk back on the table. Despite this potential concern laid out above, we believe continued economic growth, decent employment, and moderate inflation levels remain intact - and interpret the above risk as acceptable for now.

. . .

After nearly nine months of inactivity on monetary policy, the Federal Reserve lowered the fed funds rate by a quarter of a percentage point (0.25%) in the prior week, moving the target range to 4.00 – 4.25%.2 In the press conference, Jerome Powell noted the “downside risks to employment have increased”, shifting the overall balance of risk (between inflation and full employment) in support of the move for a cut.3 Meaning, the central bank is taking proactive action to prevent further slowdown in the labor market, specifically in hiring, or an increase in layoffs.

Recent payroll data has pointed to softening in the overall labor market.4 Job creation appears to be running lower than the level needed to keep the unemployment rate constant. Unemployment remains steady near historical lows but is forecasted to rise to 4.5% by year-end and decline to 4.4% in 2026 and 4.3% in 2027.5 Payroll gains have also slowed to roughly 29,000 jobs added on average per month over the past three months. Some of the weaknesses are likely due to lower growth in labor force participation, affected by immigration laws that have resulted in a sharp slowdown in migration into the U.S. While hiring has slowed, it appears so have layoffs. Meanwhile, wage growth has continued to grow, outpacing inflation. The state of the labor market as described by Fed Chairman Powell is currently “unusual,” with softer demand in the supply of and demand for labor.

As for the other half of the Fed’s dual mandate, inflation remains slightly elevated (above the Fed’s target of 2.0%) but appears sustainable.6 Year-over-year PCE (Personal Consumption Expenditures) stands at 2.9%, with the central bank forecasting high prices throughout the remainder of the year, then modest decreases in the upcoming years, estimating an inflation rate of 2.6% in 2026 and 2.1% in 2027.5
As for economic growth, the forecasts for GDP (Gross Domestic Product) indicated further expected strength. September’s projections for economic growth rose from June’s projections, forecasting 1.6% growth this year, 1.8% next year, and 1.9% in 2027.5

While the decision for a rate cut at the September meeting was virtually unanimous, views on future policy show a wide disparity. The median expectation from the central bank calls for two additional 25 basis point cuts through the end of the year, with a wider range of expectations thereafter.

[1] https://media.ycharts.com/charts/

[2] Federal Reserve issues FOMC statement

[3] The Fed - September 16-17, 2025 FOMC Meeting

[4] Employment Situation Summary - 2025 M08 Results

[5] Summary of Economic Projections, September 17, 2025

[6] Personal Income and Outlays, July 2025 | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)

Upcoming Reports

Monday: FOMC Member Williams Speaks 

Tuesday: Fed Chair Powell Speaks 

Wednesday: Building Permits, New Home Sales, FOMC Member Daly speaks

Thursday: GDP, Durable Goods Orders, Existing Home Sales

Friday: PCE Price Index, Michigan Consumer Expectations and Sentiment

Market Performance Stats

Aviance Capital Partnersis a Naples, FL-based registered investment advisor with advisors in Naples and Orlando. We provide professional wealth management,financial planning, and investment strategiessince 2009. Our financial advisors are fiduciaries, offering services such as retirement income planning, tax-efficient investing, and customized portfolio management, all designed to help clients achieve their long-term financial goals.

Whether you're preparing for retirement or seeking a tailored investment management strategy,Aviance’s wealth advisorsin Naples and wealth advisors in Orlando provide financial planning and investment management services to investors in all of Florida and beyond.

Thank you for reading. If you have any questions or concerns, or would like to speak with a member of our team, please click the button below to reach out to us. We would love to hear from you!

Aviance Capital Partners
Aviance Capital Partners
fbin
Disclosures: Aviance Capital Partners, LLC (“ACP”) is an SEC registered investment adviser located in Naples, Florida. Registration as an investment adviser is not an endorsement by securities regulators and does not imply that ACP has attained a certain level of skill, training, or ability. While information presented is believed to be factual and up-to-date, ACP does not guarantee its accuracy and it should not be regarded as a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the authors as of the date of publication and are subject to change. Not all services will be appropriate or necessary for all clients, and the potential value and benefit of the ACP’s services will vary based upon the client’s individual investment, financial, and tax circumstances. The effectiveness and potential success of a tax strategy, investment strategy, and financial plan depends on a variety of factors, including but not limited to the manner and timing of implementation, coordination with the client and the client’s other engaged professionals, and market conditions. This should not be construed as specific investment, financial planning or tax advice tailored to an individual reader. ACP suggests that readers consult a financial professional, attorney or tax advisory professional about their specific financial, legal or tax situation. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss, and different investments and types of investments involve varying degrees of risk. There can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy, including those undertaken or recommended by ACP, will be profitable or equal any historical performance level. The index and sector performance data appearing or referenced above has been compiled by the respective copyright holders, trademark holders, or publication/distribution right owners. Historical performance results for investment indexes or sectors represented are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent actual portfolio performance. The indexes or sectors represented generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and custodial charges, or the deduction of an investment-management fee, which would decrease historical performance results. Investors cannot invest directly in an index. ACP makes no warranty, express or implied, for any decision taken by any party in reliance upon such index information.

The S&P 500 is the Standard & Poor’s index calculated on a total return basis. Widely regarded as the benchmark gauge of the U.S. equities market, this index includes a representative sample of 500 leading companies in leading industries of the U.S. economy. Although the S&P 500 focuses on the large-cap segment of the market, with over 80% coverage of U.S. equities, it also serves as a proxy for the total market. The Dow Jones is a price-weighted market index that tracks 30 large, blue-chip companies. The NASDAQ is the second-largest stock and securities exchange and attracts more technology-focused or growth-oriented companies. The Russell 2000 Index is a small-cap stock market index that makes up the smallest 2,000 stocks in the Russell 3000 Index. The Russell 1000 Index is a subset of the larger Russell 3000 Index and represents the 1,000 top companies by market capitalization. Bond Aggregate is represented by the iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF.

All “expectations, forecasts, consensus, or estimates” are based on Bloomberg unless otherwise specified.

Additional information about ACP, including its Form ADV Part 2A describing its services, fees, and applicable conflicts of interest and its Form CRS is available upon request and at https://adviserinfo.sec.gov/firm/summary/146597. For current ACP clients, please advise us promptly in writing, if there are ever any changes in your financial situation or investment objectives, if you wish to impose any reasonable restrictions to our management of your account, or if you have not been receiving at least quarterly account statements from your account custodian.

This material was developed and produced by FMG Suite to provide information on a topic that may be of interest. FMG Suite is not affiliated with the named broker-dealer, state- or SEC-registered investment advisory firm.